Tag Archives: meetings

Cosmology for the 21st Century : the Electric Universe

“A real cosmology must be a broad and coherent natural philosophy. It may always be incomplete, based on our limitations, but to be valid there can be no exceptions in our experience. In particular, cosmology must address issues of life and the human condition. Therefore it must be a truly interdisciplinary pursuit.” – Wallace Thornhill

In October 2014 Astrotas sponsored philosopher & physicist  Wallace Thornhill  from Canberra to present the paradigm shattering  Electric Universe theory. This was a truly mind expanding talk drawing on his 5 decades of accumulated knowledge. Wallace is a modern Galileo whose work, following on from that of Ralph Juergens, is at odds with the current erroneous cosmology of the Big Bang and Einstein’s theory of Relativity. It was pretty amazing to have people flying in from Melbourne and Sydney to listen to him!wal carrie juan

Wallace kindly helped us put together a video of his talk which serves as a fine introduction to his life’s work without overwhelming technical detail.  In preparing his talk I asked him to assume no background knowledge of electricity in the audience except an ability to put batteries in the right way round.

The good news – no global warming, we have a unified theory of everything, the universe is not full of weird behaviors and stuff can travel faster than light

The bad news – no more alternate universes or time travel for Dr Who script writers, and we have to somehow convince more mainstream scientists to walk away from imaginary complex mathematical models and their (expensive) errors eg. designing a comet lander for an icy ‘dirty snowball’ instead of a rocky chunk ejected electrostatically from a planet.


Books mentioned by Wal:

The following month he was off to Portland Oregon for a high powered EU workshop where he delivered the technical version of his stunning “Theory of Everything” in a mere 45 mins! Cosmology for the 21st Century – video below.  Further personal commentary on the EU theory are in posts in this blog (including an simple explanation of the electric theory of gravity discussed briefly by Wal ) It is time to rewrite the textbooks!


Wallace Thornhill Bio


Wal Thornhill’s website: http://www.holoscience.com

Wal at Astrotas Oct 2014

Wallace Thornhill  is now the chief scientific advisor to the Thunderbolts Project http://www.thunderbolts.info. He has a degree in physics and electronics from Melbourne University and began postgraduate studies with Prof. Victor Hopper’s upper atmosphere research group. Before entering university he had been inspired by Immanuel Velikovsky’s best-selling controversial book, Worlds in Collision, which contends that “our ancestors may have witnessed awe inspiring electrical events in the heavens—the source of myths and symbols around the world.” Rather than pursue a career in astrophysics in an academia generally hostile to such a line of enquiry, Wal turned to computing, working with IBM and the prestigious IBM Systems Development Institute in Canberra, followed by the Australian Department of Foreign Affairs while continuing his studies of plasma and electricity in astronomy privately. He has been mentored by Velikovsky himself.

In 1994 his life changing meeting with David Talbott, at the Velikovsky Symposium in Oregon led to their collaboration on the Thunderbolts Project. Together they have authored two books – the Electric Universe and Thunderbolts of the Gods

He is a 2010 Telesio-Galilei Academy of Science Laureate. In 2011 he delivered “Stars in an Electric Universe” as the John Chappell Memorial Lecture at the Natural Philosophy Alliance, Maryland University https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AFcNHHxSFl4 He received their Sagnac Award for his lifelong contribution to science in 2013.

Above that Wallace is a passionate pacifist and a dedicated educator.

“The Australian Aborigines have their stories of the dream time where there’s a rainbow serpent that changed the face of the Earth and did all sorts of amazing things when there were two suns in the sky and the rainbow snake swallowed one of them. All of these kinds of things have an actual explanation in terms of plasma physics but they have no explanation in standard astronomy.
The result of that is that our cultures are built around stories we don’t understand, but the electric universe illuminates those as well. So we begin to see our real place in the scheme of things and that is a liberating thing. It is something that the human race desperately needs I think because we are at present behaving quite irrationally. When you look at our situation in the universe and here we are fighting over petty things. We’re destroying our environment willy nilly.” – Wal Thornhill, SOTT interview

When I announced Wallace Thornhill was coming to give a talk to Astrotas some people ( not to mention me! ) were flabbergasted we could get such a high profile international speaker with our carefully hoarded little budget. This is simply a testimony to how NICE Wal is and the genuine passion he has for his subject, and for communicating the workings of plasma physics to all ages and stages. Wal is excellent company, likes his gluten freefood and drink 😉 It was a pleasure to host him and we had some fun before and after the talk with a quick visit to a few local attractions. (This warmness and niceness is a hallmark of ALL the past Astrotas speakers – just amazing souls, as well as very knowledgeable people. )

Science of the third millennium


This is a beautifully written piece which pretty much sums up the impact Wallace’s work has on a lot of people including yours truly.

The Electric Universe: Slide Presentation & Notes by Wallace Thornhill
(KRONIA, Beaverton, Oregon, 1997)

Reviewed by Amelia Acheson

Thornhill’s presentation offers a visual invitation to toss aside the
straightjacket of paradigm paralysis and to explore the Solar System
from an electric point of view. He covers an enormous range of
phenomena, from subatomic particles through stellar evolution,
floodlighting our understanding of the universe with insights garnered
from mythical symbols, space probes, and the plasma physics lab. As an
illustration, let me compare the received explanation re the tail of
Halley’s Comet with Thornhill’s electric account, both presented in
light of photographs returned by the ESA spacecraft Giotto in March,
1986. The standard theory has it that: “Comets grow tails only when
they get warm enough for ice and dust to boil off…[O]n the [sunward
side], jets of gas and dust spurt from active holes in its surface and
are illuminated by the sun.”[1]

Thornhill’s electrical theory of the same data reads: “The fly-by of
Comet Halley didn’t show material being boiled away, instead it showed
plasma beams centered on craters facing the Sun. What we saw were
circular craters being formed right in front of the Giotto cameras —
producing the same kind of scarring seen on asteroids and moons. That
the material was being electrically removed was confirmed by the
discovery of x-rays and high energy ions near the nucleus.”

Thornhill goes on to discuss non-gravitational orbital anomalies, then
attacks received opinion which states that a comet is defined by its
size and composition. He claims instead that it is the eccentricity of
the orbit of a celestial body, moving it into regions of increasing
electrical stress, which creates the visible tail. “A planet on such
an orbit would put on a spectacular cometary display…” (p. 48.)

Thornhill found his motivation to leave the comfortable highway of
orthodox astronomy and explore the lonely out-back of a new paradigm
in the study of catastrophist mythology. Along the way, he
incorporated insights from plasma physics and atmospheric electrical
phenomena. The process of synthesizing these viewpoints into a new
paradigm involved years of research, but Thornhill summarizes it
admirably in a single picture, one so startling that it appears three
times in this notebook. The photo in question shows an ancient statue
of Zeus, thunderbolt poised in his up-raised hand. But the object
called “thunderbolt” isn’t the familiar zigzag lightning symbol.
Instead, it’s a bundle of corkscrew filaments within a football-shaped
envelope, a form recognizable today as a plasmoid. The ancient artist,
who presumably had no experience in plasma labs, sculpted a likeness
that has been meaningless for centuries — until a replica was
produced in modern times by connecting two electrodes in a vacuum to a
high-voltage source. Is this a coincidence, or were the thunderbolts
of Zeus interplanetary electrical discharges?

Thornhill recommends Eric J. Lerner’s, The Big Bang Never Happened,[2]
as an introduction to the concepts of the electrical universe. I
agree, but with a couple of reservations. It should come with a
warning: Lerner’s political and religious opinions (including, but not
limited to, barbs against catastrophism) may be offensive to some
readers. In addition, while describing the scalability of plasma
phenomena, jumping from events in the lab to similar events in
galaxies, his imagination fails him at the stellar scale. Once inside
the orbit of Pluto, Lerner drops the electric paradigm for the more
conventional gravitational Solar System and nuclear powered Sun. This
— the electric Solar System — is precisely the arena that
Thornhill’s notebook covers.

Thus, Thornhill challenges us to drop the accepted view of the Sun as
an isolated fusion factory and think of it as a focal point of
galactic electrical energy. He tells us: “…although it is true that
a plasma is a good conductor, it is very limited in its ability to
carry current. So, if the rate of charge separation within the galaxy
exceeds the capability of the plasma threading the spiral arms to
carry it, the plasma will be under constant stress and current will
flow continuously, powering the stars within it.” (p. 28.)

In defense of this outrageous claim, Thornhill points out that stellar
electrical discharges provide a simple explanation for solar phenomena
that have baffled the atomic energy paradigm. Among these mysteries
are: Where did all the neutrinos go if the Sun is fusion-powered? Why
is the corona so much hotter than the surface of the Sun? Why do the
outer layers of the Sun rotate faster than the inner? Why does the
solar wind accelerate as it gets farther from the Sun? And what are
sunspots, anyway? Thornhill’s presentation compares close-ups of
sunspots to Birkeland currents — the distinctive twisted filaments
that plasmas form because of their long-range attraction and
close-range repulsion. He speculates that sunspot activity, as well as
the size and color of a star, are functions of the strength of the
galactic plasma field the star is embedded in. In this viewpoint, even
gravity becomes a variable, dependent on the electrical field in which
an object is orbiting.

Of course, no new theory can stand without predictions against which
it can be tested, and Thornhill’s predictions are no less outrageous
than the rest of his theory. For example: “…there are no
supermassive stars. The masses of close orbiting stars, where plasma
sheaths touch, are incorrectly deduced from gravitational forces
alone…I believe there are no such things as neutron stars…[and] we
are left with none of the necessary precursors to the infamous
black-hole…[T]hey are an unnecessary fiction required simply because
astronomers consider gravity to be the only force driving the cosmos.
An infinitely weak force requires an infinite concentration of mass to
create the energetic events witnessed in deep space. The mathematical
necessity does not make it real.” (p. 32.)

The questions packed into the seven pages from 25 to 32 of Thornhill’s
notebook titled “What is the Sun?” are enough to inspire many volumes
of research. But Thornhill goes on for another 70 pages, describing
how the electrical paradigm affects our understanding of the rest of
the Solar System. At every scale, on every planet, satellite, asteroid
and comet, he finds evidence to support an electrically driven system,
one involved in recent turmoil. He compares discharges in the
high-voltage lab to lightning scars on golf courses to lava tubes in
Hawaii to sinuous rilles on the Moon. He finds that these enormous
scars on the Moon, called rilles, have more in common with lightning
scars than with collapsed lava tubes, which is the conventional
astronomical explanation.

On Mars, Thornhill claims that Valles Marineris, the gash across the
face of the planet which the North American Indians called Scarface,
is an example of a cathode discharge, like the lightning scars on a
golf course. He interprets Olympus Mons, the biggest “volcano” in the
Solar System, as an anode discharge, a giant “blister,” comparable to
fulgamites found on lightning conductors after a strike.

When it comes to Venus, Thornhill displays photographs of unique
arachnoid, or spider web, patterns of craters and rilles, along with
on-channel cratering and parallel channels terminating in craters. All
are characteristic of electrical discharges. Astronomers haven’t yet
agreed with catastrophists that Venus is young, but they now refer to
its pristine appearance as “recently resurfaced.”

Thornhill’s theory replaces the impact model of crater formation with
an electrical discharge model for a majority of the craters in the
Solar System. In defense of this viewpoint, he points out that most
craters are round, whereas impact craters would more likely be
elliptical. They appear in lines along the bottom of, and parallel to,
sinuous rilles on many celestial bodies. Often, the craters on
asteroids and the smaller moons are so large that if they were formed
by impact the entire body would have been destroyed. (Mars’ moon,
Phobos, appears in one photograph as an illustration of this point.)

When I first saw Thornhill’s original slide presentation on which this
notebook is based, one slide stood out for me as the most dramatic
moment of the entire show. Near the end of the lecture (p. 91 in the
notebook), the room was buzzing with side conversations. Without
waiting for the whispers to die down, Thornhill projected his next
picture. Someone gasped, and I turned to look. On the screen I saw
twenty-one comets stretched out in a celestial shish kebab, one that
remained coherent (the few off-line bodies actually moved continuously
into straighter alignment) for a full two-earth-year-long orbit. Until
I saw that slide, my view of the Saturn thesis was darkened by the
skeptical thought: “Sure, catastrophism is probable. Even the
electrical nature of the cosmos is beginning to make sense. But who in
their right mind, no matter what the ancient sources state, could
accept the concept of celestial bodies strung out in a coherent line?”
But this slide wasn’t a cave artist’s interpretation from the dim
reaches of myth. It was a photograph taken through a telescope in
1994: Comet Shoemaker-Levi 9. An observer looking toward Jupiter from
any one of the outer bodies would have seen the others centered on
Jupiter, their cometary tails layered into a cosmic mountain or tree.

Hubble image of Shoemaker-Levy 9 on 1994-05-17 21 icy fragments stretched across 710 thousand miles (1.1 million km) of space, or 3 times the distance between Earth and the Moon.

Emotionally, Thornhill’s presentation was the event that, for me,
changed the polar configuration from an interesting interpretation of
mythology to an astronomical possibility. In addition, Thornhill has
given me the richness of a new paradigm through which to view the
universe. But Thornhill isn’t asking for followers, only for
objectivity. He thus sums up the notebook with:

“…it is up to you to
decide whether what I am presenting is merely science fiction — or
the beginnings of the science of the third millennium of the present
era. If the latter, it is a far richer science which has no rigid
disciplinary boundaries and encompasses all of human experience. That
is the kind of science I would wish for my grand-children.”


[1] J. R. Spencer & J. Mitton, The Great Comet Crash (Cambridge,
1995), p. 2.

[2] (N. Y., 1992).

Amateur Astronomer and Thunderbolts team member Amy (Amelia) Acheson (1946 – 2005) edited the Thoth ‘catastrophics’ newsletter. If you wish to immerse yourself thoroughly in the Science of the third millennium that is probably not a bad place to start getting up to speed. Thoth archives here: http://othergroup.net/thoth/

I found her beautiful text buried on this website saturniancosmology.org via a google search. It doesn’t seem to be linked to the main work so I have republished it. A bit more digging shows it was published in a  Velikovskian magazine Aeon V:2 (Apr 1998)  http://www.catastrophism.com/cdrom/pubs/journals/aeon/ ( Ev Cochrane the publisher is also deceased so I’m not really sure who to write to for permissions – probably editor Dwardu Cardona ( awesome Star Wars name 🙂

Cancer – $eriou$ Bu$ine$$


Did you catch Stateline last Friday? Troy Langman of Tascann will be along to talk to Astrotas about Medical Marijuana soon. Local lady Natalie Daly speaks out

And finally ““The Burzynski Research Institute, Inc. (BRI) announced today that U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has notified the company that its partial clinical hold on its IND for Antineoplastons A10/AS2-1 Injections has been lifted.  The FDA has determined that under its IND the Company may initiate its planned Phase 3 study in newly diagnosed diffuse, intrinsic, brainstem glioma.  The Company is continuing discussions with the Agency in an effort to finalize additional details of the phase 3 study protocol for the potential clinical trial.”

to honor the FDA lifting its ban on Burzynski, “Burzynski: Cancer Is Serous Business, Part II” is available to watch for FREE online, anywhere in the world, until July 15th: https://vimeo.com/69209285

You can also see part one online which was screened at Astrotas in 2011. Shontelle Hiron, the aussie Burzynski patient I contacted for more information before screening at Astrotas is not in either movie but she has her old Current Affairs TV clips online. Read more about her remarkable story here – http://wp.me/p18qSp-3C

The fight to allow any patient access to his treatment is far from over. It shocked me to learn that at the time my schoolfriend’s mother died of a similar tumour Shontelle was in Texas receiving this potentially curative treatment.

Unearthed March Meeting pt 1


Coinciding with Tasmanian elections but independant of any political party we screened a few short videos on coal seam gas extraction by fracking in the Karoo, the vast heart of South Africa. video 2 video 1

Quite timely considering the eruption in the press a few days before – “A leaking pond that contaminated an aquifer with uranium at levels 20 times safe drinking guidelines is still being used, despite coal seam gas operator Santos knowing it was faulty more than two years ago.
Santos eastern Australia vice-president James Baulderstone confirmed on Monday that Bibblewindi pond at the site in the Pilliga forest, in north-west NSW, was being used to store water from previous operations, which was produced from exploratory drilling into coal seams. Poor quality pond lining has been blamed.” SMH 10 march 2014

the fine was $1500 in australian pesos
worse the MAX fine possible was $1 million; worser according to NSW govt. “The CSG industry in NSW is subject to the toughest controls in Australia.” begging the question which state’s got the flimsiest? Does anyone else find it alarming that there isn’t a national consensus on best practice? There is now a ban on evaporation ponds in NSW and the site is being cleaned up – http://www.csg.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0018/41535/FactSheet.pdfdogs with pizza

proving the sentiment expressed by investigative filmaker Jolynn Minaar that the CSG regulatory bodies are unable to protect the environment since they are making it up as they go along. You can watch her full length documentary ‘Un-earthed’  here : http://youtu.be/IPIEzSwPwT0 and keep abreast of coal seam gas in Tasmania here: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Stop-Unconventional-Mining-Tasmania/489647581112052

I’ll let the global health experts from Melbourne University sum it up

It is clear that Australia must quickly move beyond its reliance on coal for health and environmental reasons. However, when taking into consideration the uncertainties over health risks, the unfavourable comparisons with other energy options, the climate risks associated with fugitive emissions, the moral obligations Australia faces as a gas exporter, the potential displacement of renewables and doubts raised over the claim that gas will prove to be a cheap energy option,33 the scale is firmly tipped against the further development of unconventional gas. ~ https://www.mja.com.au/journal/2014/200/4/harms-unknown-health-uncertainties-cast-doubt-role-unconventional-gas-australias